I starred: 社会媒体怎样放大了公众的愤怒

via: http://article.yeeyan.org/view/97257/208446

来源How social media are amplifying customer outrage

How social media are amplifying customer outrage By Chris Taylor, Special to CNN

社会媒体怎样放大了消费者的不满     作者:克里斯 泰勒,CNN独家新闻

July 22, 2011 — Updated 1916 GMT (0316 HKT) | Filed under: Social Media

Editor’s note: Chris Taylor is San Francisco bureau chief of Mashable, a popular tech news blog and a CNN.com content partner.


编者备注:克里斯 泰勒,著名电视新闻博客玛莎波尔Mashable的圣弗朗西斯科分部主管,兼CNN网站的优秀合作者

(CNN) — Chances are, last week wasn’t a great time to be working at Netflix.


After the company raised the price of its DVD and streaming media plan by 60%, it had to draft hundreds of extra customer service reps to handle the floods of irate callers.


Netflix rival Redbox briefly became one of the most popular searches on Google. The Netflix blog announcing the price increase filled with 4,000 comments, nearly all negative.


But that number was dwarfed by the 79,000-plus responses on Netflix’s Facebook page — and that was just on the brief announcement linking to the blog entry.


It was like angry graffiti, covering every inch of what is ostensibly a corporate wall. Netflix showed no sign of backing down, but the graffiti showed no sign of stopping, either.


On the phone, in e-mail, in the largely anonymous comments section of a blog — these are places where you generally vent your disapproval once and then slink away to be disgruntled alone.


But is a social network different? The comfortingly clear identities of people who share your outrage, reinforcing your opinion with camaraderie and conversation — do these things stoke anger that would have otherwise fizzled out?


Does this environment inherently encourage people to take the next step, to turn from commenters to protesters, to organize, to boycott? I believe it may well do that. Here’s why.


The cottage cheese protest


Exhibit A in this argument, as you might expect, is the Middle East, circa spring 2011. But I’m not just talking about the Facebook-based protests that toppled governments or the social media campaign organized by brave women posting YouTube videos of themselves defying Saudi Arabia’s ban on female drivers.


There’s a more prosaic but no less illustrative example in Israel, where the three main dairies all decided to increase the price of cottage cheese by 75% last month.


That seemed like just another grumble-inducing rise in the cost of living until 25-year-old Itzik Alrov started a Facebook campaign calling on his fellow Israelis to let cottage cheese “stay in the stores and spoil until the price comes down.”

这像是另一个在生活消费方面埋怨和愤怒爆发的导火索,最终,一个25岁的年轻人Itzik Alrov在Facebook上组织了抵制运动,号召他的亲朋好友“在白干酪降价之前,让它待在商店里,直到变质烂掉。”

The group gained 105,000 adherents by month’s end. (Not bad for a nation of 7 million.) Suddenly, opposition MPs were dumping tubs of the stuff on the prime minister’s desk, and the finance minister was talking about importing cheaper foreign cheese.


The dairy companies promptly cut their prices. Here’s a tellingly bemused quote from one of their CEOs: “Something happened here, and it changed the rules of the game.”


Changing rules


You can see those rules changing all over, if you watch closely. This month a woman in a Detroit suburb faced the prospect of 93 days in jail for growing vegetables in her front yard, in apparent violation of a local ordinance. Then a Facebook page supporting her went viral, thousands of strangers from across the U.S. signed her petition, and the town planners dropped the charges.


The week before, fashion giant Versace was forced to stop its 500,000 Facebook fans from posting on its wall in the wake of a protest over sandblasted jeans (made in a high-pressure process that has been known to kill workers).


And social media outrage added a dimension to the closure of the UK’s News of the World tabloid when axed staffers got into Twitter brawls with celebrities and ex-readers.


No, not every protest is successful. Not every angry tweet matters. Not every online petition will force a company or a country to back down. And it’s too early to tell whether companies such as Versace will be punished for simply deleting protests.


Maybe that will turn out to be the social media equivalent of hitting the mute button. It’s also the kind of gamble on a company’s reputation that can keep brand managers up at night.


Who wants to take that kind of chance? Far safer to let your customers vent and hope the storm will pass, as Netflix is doing. But that too carries the risk of a boycott — or a permanently damaged reputation.


The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of Chris Taylor.

这篇评论文章中的观点仅仅代表克里斯 泰勒。








at July 24, 2011 at 10:30AM



Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / 更改 )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / 更改 )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / 更改 )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / 更改 )

Connecting to %s